Effect of Temporal and Spatial Myopia on Managerial Performance

Abbas Gatea Atiyah

doi:10.37899/journallabisecoman.v3i4.776

Abbas Gatea Atiyah College of Administration and Economic, University of Thi-Qar, Iraq

DOI: https://doi.org/10.37899/journallabisecoman.v3i4.776

Keywords: Managerial Performance, Temporal Myopia, Spatial Myopia, Organizational Success

Abstract

An important role played by the strength of a company's position in the industry, companies must examine the factors that hinder building their strategic position. Companies need to have a successful management performance. It is the process of planning, organizing, and directing tasks, as well as monitoring the implementation of tasks. Therefore, this study aimed to explore the size of the obstacle posed by spatial myopia and temporal myopia in weakening the ability of organizations to achieve successful managerial performance. Where this is embodied in the hypotheses of the study, which state: There is an effect of spatial myopia and temporal myopia in achieving successful managerial performance. Therefore, the hypotheses of the study were tested in one of the important institutions in the oil sector (the petroleum products distribution company in Thi-Qar Governorate). The test was conducted on a sample of (132) managers from all managerial levels in the company. The research model and its hypotheses were tested using SmartPLS. The results of the study showed that there is an effect of spatial myopia and temporal myopia on the performance of organizations. So the study made some conclusions about how to treat. And the transition to adopting the concept of managerial hyperopia is one of the useful tools for the success of the organization's performance.

References

Alhamzah Alnoor, Victor Tiberius, Abbas Gatea Atiyah, Khai Wah Khaw, The Sin Yin, XinYing Chew & Sammar Abbas. (2022). How Positive and Negative Electronic Word of Mouth (eWOM) Affects Customers’ Intention to Use Social Commerce? A Dual-Stage Multi Group-SEM and ANN Analysis. International journal of human–computer interaction https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2022.2125610.

Arndt, M., Bigelow, B., (2000). “Presenting structural innovation in an institutional environment: hospitals’ use of impression management”, Administrative Science Quarterly, 45(3). 494-522.

Barr, P.S., Stimpert, J. L., & Huff, A. S., (1992). “Cognitive change, strategic action, and organizational renewal”, Strategic Management Journal, 13(S1). 15-36.

Bonache, A.B., Maurice, J., & Moris, K., (2012). “Participation budgétaire et performance managériale: lien non significatif et contingences/budgetary participation and managerial performance: non-significant link and contingencies”. Comptabilité Contrôle Audit, 18(2). 125-184.

Bonner, J. M., Kim, D., & Cavusgil, S. T., (2005). Self-perceived strategic network identity and its effects on market performance in alliance relationships. Journal of Business Research. 58(10), 1371–1380. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2004.07.002.

Brislin, R.W., (1970). Back-translation for cross-cultural research. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 1(3). 185-216.

Brownell, P., and McInnes, M., (1986). Budgetary participation, motivation, and managerial performance. Accounting Review, 61(4). 587-600.

Chin, W. W. (1998). Commentary: Issues and opinion on structural equation modeling. MIS Quarterly, 22(1), 7-16.

Chow, Kato, and Merchant, J., (1996). The Use Of Organizational Control!3 And Their Effects On Data manipulation And Management Popia: A Japan Vs U.S. Comparison. Accounting. Orgnnfzatkm And Sockty. 21(2/3). 175-192.

D’Aveni, R.A. & MacMillan, I.C., (1990). Crisis and the content of managerial communications: a study of the focus of attention of top managers in surviving and failing firms”. Administrative Science Quarterly. 35(4). 634-657.

David N. Boote, and Penny Beile., (2014). Scholars Before Researchers: On the Centrality of the Dissertation Literature Review in Research Preparation. Sage pub. Educational Researcher, 34, No. 6, pp. 3–15. doi:10.3102/0013189X034006003.

Elisabeth Struckell, Divesh Ojha, Pankaj C. Patel, Amandeep Dhir., (2022). Strategic choice in times of stagnant growth and uncertainty: An institutional theory and organizational change perspective. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. Volume, 182, September. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121839.

Gonzalez Rodrigo, Valio Dominguez, Martins Manoel Fernando,. (2014). Knowledge Management: an Analysis From the Organizational Development. Technology Management Innovation J. 9(1).

Hair, J., Black, W., Babin, B., Anderson, R. (2010). Multivariate Data Analysis: A Global Perspective. Multivariate Data Analysis: A Global Perspective, 7th.

Hall, M. (2008). The effect of comprehensive performance measurement systems on role clarity, psychological empowerment and managerial performance. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 33(2). 141-163.

Hidenori Sato., (2012). Routine-Based View of Organizational Learning and Mechanisms of Myopia. Annals of Business Administrative Science. V(11). 45–54.

Laverty, K.J., (1996). Economic ‘short-termism’: the debate, the unresolved issues, and the implications for management practice and research. Academy of Management Review. 21(3). 825-860.

LavertyK J., (1996). E-conomic' short-termism': the debate, the unresolved issues, and the implications for management practice and research. Academy of Management Review. 21: 825 -860.

Levinthal D, March JG., (1993). The myopia of learning. Strategic Management Journal, Winter Special Issue 14: 95-112.

Levinthal, D. A., and March, J. G., (1996). The myopia of learning. Strategic Management Journal. 14(2 S), 95–112. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250141009

Levinthal, D. A., March, J. G., (1993). The myopia of learning. Strategic Management Journal. 14(S2), 95–112.

Miller, K. D., (2002). Knowledge inventories and managerial myopia. Strategic Management Journal. 23(8), 689–706. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.245.

Powell, Thomas C., (2018). Absence-Neglect and the Origins of Great Strategies. Strategy science j. 3(1). 306–312.

Ridge, J. W., Kern, D., White, M. A., (2014). The influence of managerial myopia on firm strategy. Management Decision. 52(3), 602–623. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-01-2013-0037

Saadat Vajiheh, (2016). Organizational Learning as a Key Role of Organizational Success . Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 230, 219 – 225.

Sato Hidenori, (2015). Organizational Change and Temporal Myopia. Annals of Business Administrative Science. 14 323–333.

SATO, H., (2012). Routine-Based View of Organizational Learning and Mechanisms of Myopia. Annals of Business Administrative Science. 11(0), 45–54. doi.org/10.7880/abas.11.45.

Sekaran, Uma, Bougie, roger., (2016). Research Methods For Business : A Skill -Building Approach. John Wiley and Sons, Inc.

Tsang, E.W.K. (2002). Self-serving attributions in corporate annual reports: a replicated study. Journal of Management Studies. 39(1). 51-65.

Tuggle, C.S., Schnatterly, K., Johnson, R.A., (2010). Attention patterns in the boardroom: how board composition and processes affect discussion of entrepreneurial issues. Academy of Management Journal. 53(3). 550-571.

Tuggle, C.S., Sirmon, D.G., Reutzel, C.R., Bierman, L., (2010). “Commanding board of director attention: investigating how organizational performance and CEO duality affect board members’ attention to monitoring”. Strategic Management Journal. Vol. 31(9). 946-968.

Tunyi, A. A., Ntim, C. G., Danbolt, J., (2019). Decoupling management inefficiency: Myopia, hyperopia and takeover likelihood. International Review of Financial Analysis. 62(November 2018), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2019.01.004.

Wheelen L., Hunger D., Hoffman, N., Bamford E., (2018). Strategic Management and Business Policy Globalization, Innovation and Sustainability. 15th Edition, Global Editions, Pearson Education Limited, New York, USA.

Атия, Аббас Гатеа., (2016). ОРГАНИЗАЦИЯ И УПРАВЛЕНИЕ ВРЕМЕНЕМ. Вестник Московского автомобильно-дорожного государственного технического университета (МАДИ). 1,62-67.