Analysis of Employee Performance at the Bahu Subdistrict Office: Study on Aspects of Quality, Quantity, Timeliness, Effectiveness and Work Independence

  • Vanessa Rambulangi Postgraduate Program, Sam Ratulangi University, Indonesia
  • Jony. R.E Tampi Postgraduate Program, Sam Ratulangi University, Indonesia
  • Femmy M. G. Tulusan Postgraduate Program, Sam Ratulangi University, Indonesia
Keywords: Employee Performance, Quality, Quantity, Effectiveness, Timeliness, Independence

Abstract

The sub-district government is a work unit that directly serves the community. The inability of employees to carry out each work program is a reflection of their achievements, performance and service. This research was conducted to determine the performance of employees at the Bahu Village Office, Malalayang District, Manado City. The research design used is qualitative. The research findings show that the performance of employees in the Shoulder sub-district office is generally good in terms of work quality, work quantity, effectiveness, punctuality and work independence. This success cannot be separated from the quality of the employees and the system that has been developed through applicable regulations, the leadership style of the sub-district head and the work culture that has been developed in the Bahu sub-district office. There were also several complaints about employee discipline that still needed to be improved. Therefore, training is needed to increase the capability of officers in serving the community and mastering information technology. In order to increase the quantity of work by employees, it is recommended to create applications for community service. To optimize service time, it is necessary to increase work discipline and to measure performance through monthly or quarterly reports by superiors to sub-district employees so that employee work independence can be seen.

References

Anggara, S. (2016). Administrasi Kepegawaian Negara. Bandung: CV. Pustaka Setia

Anwar Prabu Mangkunegara. (2014). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. PT. Remaja Rosdakarya. Bandung

Arifin. (2015). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif, Kuantitatif, dan R dan D. Bandung. Alfabeta

Arikunto. (2013). Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktek. Rineka Cipta. Yogyakarta

Hasibuan., Malayu. (2005). Manajemen Sumberdaya Manusia. PT. Bumi Aksara Jakarta

Mangkunegara., Anwar Prabu, (2011). Evaluasi Kinerja SDM, Cetakan Keempat, Jakarta: Penerbit Refika Aditama

Mathis, R.L & Jackson, J.H. (2006). Human Resource Management. Edisi 10. Salemba Empat. Jakarta

Moleong., Lexy J. (2007). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Edisi Revisi. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya

Nasution, F.R. & Rudi S.S. (2014). Evaluasi Kinerja Pegawai Kantor Samsat dalam Pelayanan Bea Balik Nama Kendaraan Bermotor, JPPUMA: Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan dan Sosial Politik UMA (Journal of Governance and Political UMA), 2 (1):1-17

Nawawi, H., Hadari. (2006). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia Untuk Bisnis yang Kompetitif. Gadjah Mada University Press. Yogyakarta

Nazir. M. 2013. Metode Penelitian. Ghalia Indonesia. Bogor

Robbins. (2016) dalam Bintaro dan Daryanto (2017:107). Manajemen Penilaian Kinerja Karyawan. Penerbit Gaya Media

Sugiyono. (2013). Metodologi Penelitian Kuantitatif Kualitatif R&. alfabeta,. Bandung

Sugiyono. (2017). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R & D. Bandung. Alfabeta

Umam, K. (2012). Manajemen Organisasi. Bandung: CV. Pustaka Setia Wibowo. (2007). Manajemen Kerja Edisi 1. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada

Published
2024-01-15
How to Cite
Rambulangi, V., Tampi, J. R., & Tulusan, F. M. G. (2024). Analysis of Employee Performance at the Bahu Subdistrict Office: Study on Aspects of Quality, Quantity, Timeliness, Effectiveness and Work Independence. Journal La Bisecoman, 5(1), 32-41. https://doi.org/10.37899/journallabisecoman.v5i1.1029