Implementation of Bureaucratic Reform and Development of Integrity Zones: Study at State Civil Service Agency

Agustina Dorsima Dolonseda; Stefanus  Sampe; Very Y.  Londa

doi:10.37899/journallabisecoman.v5i1.1024

Agustina Dorsima Dolonseda Postgraduate Program, Sam Ratulangi University, Indonesia
Stefanus Sampe Postgraduate Program, Sam Ratulangi University, Indonesia
Very Y. Londa Postgraduate Program, Sam Ratulangi University, Indonesia

DOI: https://doi.org/10.37899/journallabisecoman.v5i1.1024

Keywords: Bureaucratic Reform, Staffing, Integrity Zone

Abstract

Implementing the construction of an integrity zone is one of the steps taken by the government related to bureaucratic reform. The State Civil Service Agency is a government institution responsible for the development and implementation of State Civil Service Management. This research was conducted to describe the implementation of bureaucratic reform that needs to be carried out by the Regional Office XI BKN to move towards a Clean and Serving Bureaucratic Region. By using a qualitative design, it was found that the bureaucratic reform that had been carried out by the Regional Office.

References

Busetto, L., Wick, W., & Gumbinger, C. (2020). How to use and assess qualitative research methods. Neurological Research and practice, 2, 1-10.

Cascini, F., Pantovic, A., Al-Ajlouni, Y., Failla, G., & Ricciardi, W. (2021). Attitudes, acceptance and hesitancy among the general population worldwide to receive the COVID-19 vaccines and their contributing factors: A systematic review. EClinicalMedicine, 40.

Freddy, H. T. R., Achmad, W., & Nasution, M. S. (2022). The Effectivity Of Public Services Based On Smart Goverment In Bukit Raya Distric Pekanbaru City. Journal of Governance, 7(1), 239-259.

Jones, L., & Hameiri, S. (2022). COVID-19 and the failure of the neoliberal regulatory state. Review of international political economy, 29(4), 1027-1052.

Kallio, T. J., Kallio, K. M., & Blomberg, A. (2020). From professional bureaucracy to competitive bureaucracy–redefining universities’ organization principles, performance measurement criteria, and reason for being. Qualitative research in accounting & management, 17(1), 82-108.

Lareau, A. (2021). Listening to people: A practical guide to interviewing, participant observation, data analysis, and writing it all up. University of Chicago Press.

Marzuki, S., Laksmono, B. S., & Subroto, A. (2020). Improving government's performance management by using the balanced scorecard on stakeholders perspectives. Journal of the community development in Asia, 3(3), 29-47.

Mascia, C. (2021). How bureaucracies shape access to rights: the implementation of family reunification in Belgium. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 47(9), 2127-2143.

Poeppelbuss, J., Ebel, M., & Anke, J. (2022). Iterative uncertainty reduction in multi-actor smart service innovation. Electronic markets, 32(2), 599-627.

Pryshlakivsky, J., & Searcy, C. (2021). Life Cycle Assessment as a decision-making tool: Practitioner and managerial considerations. Journal of Cleaner Production, 309, 127344.

Rastati, R. (2022). Internalizing Pancasila through pop culture and youth community. Jurnal Masyarakat Dan Budaya, 24(2).

Renjith, V., Yesodharan, R., Noronha, J. A., Ladd, E., & George, A. (2021). Qualitative methods in health care research. International journal of preventive medicine, 12.

Sager, F., & Rosser, C. (2021). Weberian bureaucracy. In Oxford research encyclopedia of politics.

Schuurman, B. (2020). Research on terrorism, 2007–2016: A review of data, methods, and authorship. Terrorism and Political Violence, 32(5), 1011-1026.

Seth, H., Chadha, S., Ruparel, N., Arora, P. K., & Sharma, S. K. (2020). Assessing working capital management efficiency of Indian manufacturing exporters. Managerial Finance, 46(8), 1061-1079.

Turner, M., Prasojo, E., & Sumarwono, R. (2022). The challenge of reforming big bureaucracy in Indonesia. Policy Studies, 43(2), 333-351.